Dominus wrote:You can say what you want Peerpressure, giving stats that kids die sooner in traffic , and terroristic attacks happen more often.
But these School-Shootings are worst then a traffic accident if you ask me.
If a parent loses his kid in traffic accident they say:
'Oh my god , why did it happen to my kid'
If a parent loses his kid in a school-shooting they say :
'Why did that stupid kid went crazy and shot all those kids , he sucks , why did he do it, why it was on my kid's school , he's a maniac, he sucks ...
I think school shootings ar far more chaotic in the memories of the people that survived and the parents of the kids that died..
This is pure speculation on your part and it doesn't even stand up to the mildest scrutiny. In a traffic accident there will be someone to blame just like in a shooting.
+ in Europe , Terroristic attacks are rare (let's hope it stays that way) but school shootings are coming closer to home I have to admit..
I guess the rarity of terrorist attacks depends on how you define "terrorist attacks", but even in the strictest of definitions the Madrid and London bombings would be included. In Madrid 191 people were killed, in London 56. Compare those numbers to the 37 people killed in school shootings in the last years and there's no way you can maintain that the risk of school shootings is higher than the risk of terrorism.
Booba wrote:That's just where it's about.. They are fighting terrorism to get it to low chances of getting involved in it like the chance of getting involved in astroids ''atacks''..
I was talking about the initial odds. How effective all the spending on terrorism is (compared to it's cost) is debatable. One thing a rational person (not a politician) would take into account is the area affected by risks. Terrorism attacks are local events, asteroid impacts have continental/global effects - if the risk of getting killed by either are the same and only one risk can be reduced, I think a rational person should choose the latter. Of course that's a false dichotomy, there's noone saying you can't spend money on preventing both, but that's not what's being done. Loads of money is spent on preventing local disasters while the global ones waiting to happen are ignored.
Booba wrote:However about those school shootings.. You cant really fight against it: this week here in Holland a guy in Breda said on the internet he would start a school shooting.. Fortunately they could prevent it.. But everybody who knows the guy said he was such a nice guy..So u cant really fight against it
Consider the possibility it actually is a nice guy and he made (very) inappropriate joke on the internet. It wouldn't be the first time someone with no sense of humour would be on the net...
